WISER DATA PORTRAIT SERIES  |  April 2026  |  Employment & Earnings
Households Pushed Below the Poverty Line by Liberation Day Tariffs, by Race, Sex, and Marital Status, 2024
Rhonda V. Sharpe, Ph.D.  /  Women's Institute for Science, Equity and Race  /  April 2, 2026
Key Finding
Women head 69 percent of the 2.46 million households pushed below the poverty line by Liberation Day tariffs. Nearly 70 percent of the people who fell below the poverty line live in never-married households — and the average never-married household without children contains 2.6 people, not one.
Overview   This portrait draws on WISER calculations from the 2025 CPS Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC), income year 2024. The analysis identifies households for whom the annual food cost increase from Liberation Day tariffs — import duties announced April 2, 2025 — exceeds the gap between the household's SPM resources and its SPM threshold. Food cost increase = 12.5% of SPM family resources × 5.6% tariff-driven price increase (Yale Budget Lab, 2026). All U.S. household reference persons are included, disaggregated by race, sex, marital status, and presence of children.

Main Findings

Households and People Pushed Below the Poverty Line by Liberation Day Tariffs
By Race, Sex, and Marital Status — Lowest Income Quintile, 2024
Race / Sex Married Separated Divorced Widowed Never Married Total
Women
Asian Women18,5948,96212,26825,8085,73971,372
People43,86211,22212,26826,20756,800150,359
Black Women31,81531,01571,08747,589302,322483,828
People62,29934,11583,12148,232761,960989,727
Hispanic Women82,89561,74876,60845,042178,140444,434
People169,62268,99082,21245,042747,6551,113,521
Indigenous Women3,9955,2544,5493,75217,549
People7,0407,7104,54937,68256,980
Multiracial Women8,1493,5809,57624029,18550,730
People8,1493,5809,576240172,240193,785
White Women72,27168,688198,07788,590206,480634,106
People173,03971,234218,419104,016607,2171,173,926
Total Women217,719173,993372,870211,818725,6181,702,019
People464,011189,141413,306228,2862,383,5543,678,298
Men
Asian Men28,4555,9237,68942,067
People50,0732995,92377,505133,800
Black Men34,09516,33442,02320,094106,459219,005
People55,32417,87746,12520,094594,465733,886
Hispanic Men70,42412,51621,1715,74950,628160,487
People148,67818,20023,5465,749630,291826,465
Indigenous Men1,9482,4916,06410,503
People6,4042,49173536,71046,340
Multiracial Men3414592,7293,529
People2,24445992,72095,423
White Men106,9034,73762,59432,415114,667321,316
People173,2944,73780,54638,096548,204844,876
Total Men242,16633,587128,73864,181288,236756,907
People436,01740,814153,46670,5971,979,8952,680,790
Total — Households459,885207,580501,608275,9991,013,8542,458,926
People900,028229,955566,772298,8834,363,4496,359,088
Source: WISER · U.S. Census Bureau CPS ASEC 2025 · WISER calculations from federal microdata
Household counts weighted using asecwth; people counts weighted using asecwt. Lowest income quintile only. National totals including second quintile: 2,624,297 households / 7,370,147 people.

Policy Relevance

A flat percentage tariff on imported food functions as a regressive consumption tax. The 2.62 million households identified here were not below the SPM poverty threshold before Liberation Day. The tariff eliminated their savings. The concentration of households pushed below the poverty line in never-married households reflects proximity to the poverty line, not people living alone. These are multi-person households pooling resources, yet still sit within dollars of the SPM threshold. SNAP expansion, targeted transfers, or tariff rollbacks on food staples would reduce the harm for the households identified here.

Methodology Note

Data from IPUMS CPS ASEC 2025 public use file, income year 2024 (ipums.org). Race follows Census definitions; Hispanic origin overrides race. SPM poverty status uses the pre-constructed spmpov flag from the Census Bureau SPM research file. Tariff shock = 12.5% of SPM family resources × 5.6% tariff-driven price increase (Yale Budget Lab, 2026). A household falls below the poverty line when the tariff shock exceeds its gap between SPM resources and the SPM threshold. Unit of analysis: household reference person (relate=101). Household counts weighted using asecwth; people counts weighted using asecwt. Income quintiles constructed from SPM family resources on the full sample prior to restriction to reference persons.

How to Cite:
Sharpe, Rhonda V. (2026). Households Pushed Below the Poverty Line by Liberation Day Tariffs, by Race, Sex, and Marital Status, 2024. WISER Data Portrait Series. Women's Institute for Science, Equity and Race. Available at: www.wiserpolicy.org/data-portraits/liberation-day-tariffs-poverty-2024